HEALTHCARE & PHARMA DISTRIBUTION

The admin layer of pharmaceutical distribution.

Order-to-cash, principal reporting, tender submissions, regulatory documentation. Work that appears in nobody's job description but consumes a day a week from people you hired to sell. We ran distribution centres like yours for two decades.

What we keep finding.

  • Order-to-cash runs on email attachments. POs arrive as PDFs and scans, get keyed manually, and every exception routes through the same two people.

  • Principal reporting eats the month-end. Different templates for different principals, assembled by hand from three systems, late more often than anyone admits.

  • Tender responses are rebuilt from scratch. The answers exist — in a folder, in someone's inbox, in last year's submission. Nobody can find them under deadline.

  • Regulatory documentation is tracked in a spreadsheet. Product registrations, licence expiries, and change notifications, managed by one person who cannot go on leave.

Where we can help.

  • Purchase order extraction and validationpulling structured data from PDF and scanned POs into your system, with an exception queue for anything ambiguous

  • Principal report assemblycollecting from source systems into each principal's template, on schedule

  • Tender and RFP response libraryyour own past answers, searchable in plain language, so submissions are assembled rather than rewritten

  • Regulatory documentation trackingregistration and licence expiry monitoring, renewal prompts, document completeness checks

  • Quotation turnaroundfaster quote generation from your own pricing structures and templates

  • Customer and account correspondencestatus updates, delivery notifications, routine enquiry handling

  • Internal knowledge assistantyour SOPs, product information and procedures, queryable by your team

  • Sales operations reportingpipeline, coverage, and activity reporting without the manual assembly

What we don't work on

We do not process patient data, clinical records, prescription information, or anything protected under your principals' data agreements. We do not touch pharmacovigilance systems, regulatory submissions to authorities, or anything with a clinical dimension. If a workflow needs that data to function, we design a human step around it or we tell you it's out of scope.

Our principals audit us. Will this create a problem?

It shouldn't, and that's by design. Everything we build sits outside the systems your principals audit, runs in your own accounts under your own credentials, and produces a full activity log. The data boundary means nothing protected under a principal agreement enters an AI system. We'd rather scope a project smaller than create an audit conversation you didn't plan for.

How this usually starts.

Every engagement is scoped and priced after the session, against work we've both seen. If your problem doesn't need us, we'll tell you, and point you at something cheaper.

Start with ninety minutes.

Book a Process Room Session. We'll draw one process properly and tell you honestly whether AI belongs in it.